word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 5204 | c- |
2 | 4597 | p- |
3 | 4396 | a- |
4 | 4036 | s- |
5 | 3054 | d- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 2168 | co- |
2 | 1891 | in- |
3 | 1750 | pr- |
4 | 1739 | re- |
5 | 1576 | de- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 1094 | con- |
2 | 715 | pro- |
3 | 661 | pre- |
4 | 516 | int- |
5 | 475 | com- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 345 | inte- |
2 | 306 | cons- |
3 | 296 | cont- |
4 | 230 | comp- |
5 | 167 | tran- |
word rank | frequency | n-gram |
---|---|---|
1 | 228 | inter- |
2 | 147 | contr- |
3 | 121 | trans- |
4 | 119 | const- |
5 | 93 | între- |
The tables show the most frequent letter-N-grams at the beginning of words for N=1…5. Their frequency is count without multiplicity, otherwise the stopwords would dominate the tables.
As shown in the above example (German), word prefixes are clearly visible. In the above example, ver- and ein- are prefixes, and Sch- is not. At the end of a prefix we typically have a wide variety of possible continuations. Hence a prefix of length k will be prominent in the table for N=k, but typically not in the table for N=k+1. The prominent entries Schw- and Schl- for N=4 tell us that Sch- is no prefix.
Zipf’s diagram is plotted with both axis in logarithmic scale, hence we expect nearly straight lines. The graphs look more typical for larger N. Especially for N=3 we find only a small number of trigrams resulting in a sharp decay.
For a language unknown to the reader, the data can easily be used to see whether prefixes do exist and to find the most prominent examples.
For counting, only words with a minimum character length of 10 were considered.
Because only a word list is needed, the tables above can be generated from a relatively small corpus.
For N=3:
SELECT @pos:=(@pos+1), xx.* from (SELECT @pos:=0) r, (select count(*) as cnt, concat(left(word,3),"-") FROM words WHERE w_id>100 group by left(word,3) order by cnt desc) xx limit 5;
For more insight in a language, longer lists might be useful.
Is there a need for larger N
Most frequent word endings
Most frequent letter-N-grams
Number of letter-N-Grams at word beginnings
Number of letter-N-Grams at word endings